I had posted over the weekend about a Cavalier adoption that went wrong. I returned the dog, but something about this whole thing doesn't seem quite right to me.
I did some further research and found the auction notice that this puppy was listed on at a kennel liquidation in Missouri. I also found a 'Rip Off Report' that someone had posted about the shelter we adopted from, saying that in December of 2007, the shelter was asking for extremely high adoption fees for a number of different purebreds.
While I knew this was a mill pup, I am really concerned that 1) the rescuer who bought him did no screening or assessment before allowing us to take him into our home, and even stated that she expected the dog would probably prefer our daughter's company to ours (even though this is the opposite of what is usually the case with mill dogs), and 2) she asked no questions at all when we returned him, so he could be placed appropriately. She was angry and resentful that we had sought advice about the dog's behavior. I would feel very bad if this pup went to another home with a child and there was an injury.
This woman (and her husband) have run a rescue operation for at least 10 years. Initially, she started her shelter in response to her county not having a shelter. But a few years ago, the county did build its own shelter. I am theorizing, but I suspect that she may have lost some of her support, financial and otherwise, when the county shelter got built, and had to look to other means to get funds, hence the rescue of purebred mill dogs and the higher adoption fee she can charge for them. We paid a $450 fee for the Cavalier we got.
She told me that she has about 70 dogs at this shelter that are not adoptable or are large, mixed breed outside dogs. It takes a lot to feed that many; I fear that she stumbled on the purebred mill dog rescue/adoption as a revenue generator, which is okay, but not if the dogs aren't assessed before placement, and not if potential adopters don't get a realistic idea of the challenges in adopting these animals. She does spay and neuter them and vaccinates them.
My question, I guess, is whether I should report this, and if you think so, who'd be the appropriate agency? I really do not want to cause her undue problems, but she is doing a disservice to both the dogs and the adopters if she doesn't do this the right way.
I did some further research and found the auction notice that this puppy was listed on at a kennel liquidation in Missouri. I also found a 'Rip Off Report' that someone had posted about the shelter we adopted from, saying that in December of 2007, the shelter was asking for extremely high adoption fees for a number of different purebreds.
While I knew this was a mill pup, I am really concerned that 1) the rescuer who bought him did no screening or assessment before allowing us to take him into our home, and even stated that she expected the dog would probably prefer our daughter's company to ours (even though this is the opposite of what is usually the case with mill dogs), and 2) she asked no questions at all when we returned him, so he could be placed appropriately. She was angry and resentful that we had sought advice about the dog's behavior. I would feel very bad if this pup went to another home with a child and there was an injury.
This woman (and her husband) have run a rescue operation for at least 10 years. Initially, she started her shelter in response to her county not having a shelter. But a few years ago, the county did build its own shelter. I am theorizing, but I suspect that she may have lost some of her support, financial and otherwise, when the county shelter got built, and had to look to other means to get funds, hence the rescue of purebred mill dogs and the higher adoption fee she can charge for them. We paid a $450 fee for the Cavalier we got.
She told me that she has about 70 dogs at this shelter that are not adoptable or are large, mixed breed outside dogs. It takes a lot to feed that many; I fear that she stumbled on the purebred mill dog rescue/adoption as a revenue generator, which is okay, but not if the dogs aren't assessed before placement, and not if potential adopters don't get a realistic idea of the challenges in adopting these animals. She does spay and neuter them and vaccinates them.
My question, I guess, is whether I should report this, and if you think so, who'd be the appropriate agency? I really do not want to cause her undue problems, but she is doing a disservice to both the dogs and the adopters if she doesn't do this the right way.