anniemac
Well-known member
I keep trying to find where margaret posted something but I wanted to share how complex it must be to come up with a breeding scheme when dealing with 2 major health issues.
I think the more I try to understand the more questions I have but that is why it is so important because there is a huge responsibility for breeders especially when dealing with two health conditions so I want to ask about ella.
Ellas parents both had OFA certificates signed by cardiologist as normal at ages 5 and 6. I would assume that they have good hearts especially given the age of certification and having the results.
However, ella has severe SM. So I think that all these factors have to be known in order to try to have healthy offspring. You have one good trait but then you can't ignore the other. I know the breeder did not scan but they were older and if they did not show symptoms (at least the breeder would be familiar with girl) but the father well it doesn't matter but obviously something was passed on to ella.
So I think that anything someone comes up with is going to be hard and has to factor both in. So if I'm understanding correctly, is the reason breeders should be open to find the best qualities for a match?
There is so much genetics in breeding and I think in any breed no one could ever guarantee the health of a puppy. I find it unlikely to have never had a puppy from a litter with a health condition. So in my opinion if a breeder was open and said yes this has happened and I took these steps to try to decrease the risk of a condition but you should know there is always a chance that really is all they can do. Share health conditions and information so they can best try to find the best match.
I am a question person so I think it is always good to strive for improvements but right now this is what is given and it is extremely detailed. So like having puppies and not being able to say there is not risk, you probably should do what we do know and support research for continued advancements.
I thing nothing can be perfect and I know with research we find more questions, so if 5 years down the road if everyone supported research and something was found that would could be better, couldn't things be modified?
I would think that to question is to learn but you have to do what you can with what we have. There are so many different factors that it would be impossible to find a perfect solution besides something to eliminate a gene, I don't know. But we have to all support research and be able to have certain information available.
I do know her parents have good hearts so if one did not have SM, what a good candidate for another.
Am I understanding correctly? That is why it is so important to wait until they are older or at least 2 1/2 years?
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
I think the more I try to understand the more questions I have but that is why it is so important because there is a huge responsibility for breeders especially when dealing with two health conditions so I want to ask about ella.
Ellas parents both had OFA certificates signed by cardiologist as normal at ages 5 and 6. I would assume that they have good hearts especially given the age of certification and having the results.
However, ella has severe SM. So I think that all these factors have to be known in order to try to have healthy offspring. You have one good trait but then you can't ignore the other. I know the breeder did not scan but they were older and if they did not show symptoms (at least the breeder would be familiar with girl) but the father well it doesn't matter but obviously something was passed on to ella.
So I think that anything someone comes up with is going to be hard and has to factor both in. So if I'm understanding correctly, is the reason breeders should be open to find the best qualities for a match?
There is so much genetics in breeding and I think in any breed no one could ever guarantee the health of a puppy. I find it unlikely to have never had a puppy from a litter with a health condition. So in my opinion if a breeder was open and said yes this has happened and I took these steps to try to decrease the risk of a condition but you should know there is always a chance that really is all they can do. Share health conditions and information so they can best try to find the best match.
I am a question person so I think it is always good to strive for improvements but right now this is what is given and it is extremely detailed. So like having puppies and not being able to say there is not risk, you probably should do what we do know and support research for continued advancements.
I thing nothing can be perfect and I know with research we find more questions, so if 5 years down the road if everyone supported research and something was found that would could be better, couldn't things be modified?
I would think that to question is to learn but you have to do what you can with what we have. There are so many different factors that it would be impossible to find a perfect solution besides something to eliminate a gene, I don't know. But we have to all support research and be able to have certain information available.
I do know her parents have good hearts so if one did not have SM, what a good candidate for another.
Am I understanding correctly? That is why it is so important to wait until they are older or at least 2 1/2 years?
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk