Margaret C
Well-known member
I would never tell anyone not to buy a cavalier. I would tell them not to buy a cavalier from any breeder who isn't doing MRIs, using a cardiologist rather than a vet for heart auscultations before breeding, checking hips/eyes/knees.
I do not tell people not to buy a Cavalier ( although there are days when I seriously wonder whether Cavaliers should continue to be bred ) but I think anyone buying a cavalier should have the risks honestly spelt out to them, and that is why I set up www.cavalierpuppy.co.uk
I will be adding some more information soon.
Faith has now had the mouth swabs done for the new DNA test for Dry Eye/Curly Coat and I will add the report when it arrives. I also intend to add something on understanding pedigrees and how to use the KC Mate Select to see how inbred your dog is, something anyone with a KC registered cavalier can do so easily by just going to http://www.the-kennel-club.org.uk/services/public/mateselect/inbreed/Default.aspx?breed=6149
though three of mine have SM, two need minor management and have never had other health issues and are now going on 6 and 8. Leo has managed a normal life on gabapentin for 5+ of his going on 8 years; a heart murmur now but no meds for that. Never have had allergies, patella issues, hip problems, and just one so far with serious heart problems (and she has had no other problems, and is nearly 12 -- but this is still a devastating and terrible problem and really she should have had many years ahead that she will not ). I fully understand others who have had terrible experiences feeling they would not opt again for a cavalier, and I think there are sad and high risks of serious issues in the breed, but after endless, ongoing consideration of this issue, I'd still (for now!) rather support breeders working to change this than not have this wonderful breed.
I agree we must support such breeders, but I do find it dispiriting that so few well known breeders are whole-heartedly working for change.
High profile health representatives are still registering litters with parents both well under two years of age and not even an eye test done on the mother.
Rather, I have had the experience that would make me argue 1) do not get a cavalier if you are not ready to handle these possible and widespread health issues and 2) that pet owners (and it will have to be them -- they hold all the financial pressure that could force change!) could change EVERYTHING for this breed if they only bought puppies from responsible, properly health testing breeders, avoided BYBs and puppy farmers, and if more went to the club AGMs and voted to benefit the breed so a small cabal isn't allowed to place roadblocks in the way of more seriously addressing breed health issues, starting with personal example of agreeing to abide fully by the club's own best breeding practice advice. When a national committee won't even do that -- proudly and responsibly, to send an important message to all club breeders --then what hope has the breed?
At the Cavalier Club AGM, where that proposal that committee members should breed to their own guidelines was defeated, there was great indignation expressed about a non-club breeder whose brood bitch had produced 4 litters before the age of three.
It was said a committee member would be appointed to scrutinise registrations and pick out breedings that so exploit these poor little cavaliers.
I wonder who will get that task?
Not, I hope, the committee member that co-owns a young dog that sired 23 litters before he was two, and a little bitch that had two litters before her second birthday?