Only rumour so far, but .......................
Has anyone heard how the meeting went on Thursday? The Midland Club reps were opposing the scheme - but since they never asked the membership what they thought (except at the very last minute) what they really meant was that the Midland Club Committee was opposing the scheme. :bang:
Kate, Oliver and Aled
Well Kate,
Although there was some last minute, fairly undemocratic, attempts to take "a straw poll" from some club members it seems that all those representing the clubs, have been sworn to secrecy until a report comes out.
So what is there that needs to be hidden from the ordinary members?
Foot dragging, cowardice on the part of the KC, commercial breeders' vested interest sabotaging an official scheme.
I doubt if the suffering of the over 50% of cavaliers affected by SM was even mentioned by those present?
I will tell you what I have heard, but I cannot guarantee all the details are correct. For that we will need to wait for a report that could take a long time coming.
I heard that the Cavalier Club's own health representative was missing from the meeting. Rumour says that after two years of work on the scheme she was banned from attending.
If that is true, then history certainly does repeat itself, as the same thing happened two & half years ago when I was health representative and banned from the first meeting called to set up the scheme
The last person breeders want attending is someone who really knows about the extent of SM.
I have been told that at the February 3rd meeting a revised grading scheme was discussed. It was thought it would be possible to automatically add the age at scanning to the grades.
There was the usual criticism of the cost of the scheme, & a suggestion that it may be possible to reduce the fee for a re-scan at 6 years.
As you would expect the biggest issue was publication of results. The Kennel Club seemingly suggested that the only information published in the BRS, on the KC website, and on the registration documents, was whether a dog had been MRI scanned through the offical scheme, and at what age
This would still mean that if a breeder or puppy buyer wanted to know about a dog's MRI results they would have to ask the owner and face the accusation of not "trusting their word"
Cavalier EBV's will be published, but this is not thought likely to be in the near future.
It was agreed that the KC would produce a report and the cavalier clubs would decide whether they would sign up or not.
So more foot dragging all round there.
The idea of not publishing results, if confirmed by the report, will be controversial to all those concerned with health & welfare issues. This would be the only official scheme where results are not openly published and would be seen as a worrying precedent for the KC to be setting.
In the meantime the uncaring commercial breeders will go on putting the puppies from risky breeding into the gene pool or selling them to the unsuspecting pet owner.
The newest BRS shows that our new KC health liaison representative mated his young champion dog at
14 months to a bitch who was
1 year 9 months.
The Cavalier Club MVD Guidelines say both parents should be at least 2 years 6 months.
The Cavalier Club SM guidelines say at least one parent should be scanned after 2 years 6 months, and be clear of SM.
I would love to know how he justifies his actions to himself, let alone to his regional club committee.