Well, hell yes! What more should we expect from them on this point? They spent over ten years, from 1988 (some , like Peter Darke, earlier) to compile their statistics, and then in 1997 (in the UK) and 1998 (in the US), they presented their findings along with canine geneticist Swenson's recommendation -- what now is called THE MVD Breeding Protocol.
They told us then two other things: First, that the MVD Breeding Protocol was a compromise, because if they had their way, they would call for no breeding prior to age 5 years. Second, they said nothing less would work.
In Sweden, beginning in 2001, the kennel club and the CKCS club tried something less, and in Dr. Kvart's September 2010 report, he confirmed that it did not work. He told me that he has recommended that the two clubs there follow Swenson's advice, for a change. I do not know what success he has had in convincing those clubs to do so.
But, back to my main point here: Why should we expect these researchers to have to keep repeating the same advice again in 2011 just because 95% of the cavalier breeders -- and BOTH USA CAVALIER CLUBS -- have elected to blow them all off and ignore the MVD Breeding Protocol?
They told us nothing less would work. Nothing less has worked. Case closed!