RodRussell
Well-known member
Keep in mind that the most recent research of SM in cavaliers (555 cavaliers, to be precise) concludes that "the optimum age for this early MRI screening is 36 months". So, breeding any cavalier under the age of 36 months risks producing puppies with greater than a 50% likelihood of being SM-affected.
How come the new guidelines don't incorporate those findings, instead of expressly contradict them?
How come the new guidelines don't incorporate those findings, instead of expressly contradict them?