
Originally Posted by
silki
Hi,
I am looking to buy a Puppy, I have contacting breeders that say we don't MRI but our lines have no signs of SM. I have avoided these on advice from thsi sites owner.
I have now foudn breeders saying :
Advert No 1
"Both parents are heart and eye tested by specialists, sire is mri scanned clear and so is the maternal grandmother. Sire is by CH Pascavale Enchanted and Dam is from Narayden lines."
You could ask why use a MRI scanned sire but not scan the mother who is equally as important for inheritance of SM?
Why does the breeder feel that there is merit in saying the maternal grandmother has been MRI'd but she has not bothered to scan her own bitch before breeding?
Even if both these family members that are being flagged up (in answer to your questions about health tests ) were properly scanned ( not just bred ) when they were at least two and a half years old, it still means that the tally of scanned parents/grandparents totals two out of a possible six.
This is not what is recommended in the breeding guidelines
No mention of testing for Curly cooat/Dry Eye or Episodic Falling Syndrome, which most responsible breeders have done by now.
Not a good breeder in my books

Originally Posted by
silki
Advert No 2
"Both parents have current CLEAR heart certificates, which can be seen and are BVA/KC eye tested.
Excellent 5 generation pedigree.Sire is a successful show/stud dog and has a Res CC and his JW. He has also been MRI scanned CLEAR for SM (his Sire is also scanned Clear). He has also been DNA tested CLEAR for both DE/CC (dry eye/curly coat syndrome) and EF (Episodic Falling)"
The Sire has had some success in the show ring, which says nothing about his health.
He is good for SM as long as the scan was done after he was two & a half years old. Be careful to check as many breeders now MRI their dogs young because that means there is a better chance of them scanning clear of SM. That is not what is recommended in the breeding guidelines and they are still riskier parents. The safer breeding cavaliers are those that have not developed SM when scanned when at least two to three years old.
No mention of MRI scan for mother or DNA testing? Why are those considered a selling point for father but not for mother?
Not a good breeder in my book.

Originally Posted by
silki
From what they are saying above do these seem good breeders and will teh puppy stand a good chance of being healthy ... SM and Heart condition free ??
Nobody can say for sure, there can be no guarantees, but recent studies have shown the best chance of a healthy puppy is for both parents to have been checked clear of MVD and SM when tested at two and a half years or older.
These breeders, like so many others are taking half-hearted measures so they can appear to have paid some attention to health issues and have something they can say to fool buyers into thinking they are responsible breeders.
You can ask what motivates people that know what they should be doing, that pretend to buyers they are paying attention to health, but deliberately risk producing litters that will contain over 50% of puppies that will develop early onset SM.
Margaret C
Cavaliers......Tommy Tuppence 2000-2012 and a half share of Faith.
Japanese Chins.... Dandy, Benny, Bridgette and Hana.
Bookmarks