Cavaliers-more denial and dissent
CAVALIERS- MORE DENIAL AND DISSENT
I am just wondering after reading on the UK CKCS CLUB WEB SITE the name of the New KC HEALTH REPRESENTATIVE for the Cavalier Liason Committee.
This could not possible be the same Person who has ignored both the Researchers and CKCS CLUB'S Breeding Guideline Recommendations and Bred from an Underage Cavalier.
Surely not!!!!!
I agree that reading the Dog World article it would be hard to know just why the proposal to change the way that this particular BVA/KC Scheme is recorded is thought necessary.
I think that you may need to read the actual points of the proposal on the Cavalier Club website www.thecavalierclub.co.uk
Point 3........... Neither CM or SM grades will be published, nor will they be accessible via the Health Test Result Finder.
This is contrary to every other official scheme, they are open registries, and there can only be one reason for the KC making that proposal.
A lot of things are unsaid, after all no breeder is openly going to admit he does not want other breeders and puppy buyers to know for sure he has not MRI'd his stud dog.
It would be even worse for people to know that he has scanned his champion dog but now refuses to divulge the results.
I think even this concession will not be enough for the Cavalier breeders that now act as the voice of cavalier club members in the UK, although they will not come out and say what everyone knows is the true objection to the scheme.
The latest fairly feeble excuse is the fact that some scans will not meet the criteria for the new scheme, a fact that has been known for a very long time.
It is true that there will be some cavaliers that have been scanned, perhaps more than once, & I understand that it will be galling if the KC health finder then brings up a message that no result is recorded.
I'm sure that this can be easily sorted, all that is needed is for the health liaison chairman to talk to the KC and suggest that the words " no results recorded under this current scheme" should show up instead if a copy of an old scan certificate is submitted.
I'm equally sure that some other objection to the scheme will suddenly become apparent.
I would like to think that some of the silent majority of decent responsible breeders are writing to the KC & BVA to let them know what they really want.
CAVALIERS- MORE DENIAL AND DISSENT
I am just wondering after reading on the UK CKCS CLUB WEB SITE the name of the New KC HEALTH REPRESENTATIVE for the Cavalier Liason Committee.
This could not possible be the same Person who has ignored both the Researchers and CKCS CLUB'S Breeding Guideline Recommendations and Bred from an Underage Cavalier.
Surely not!!!!!