anniemac
Well-known member
I don't want to single anyone out, but this thread bothers me because of the comments. I just would like to ask if even those helping research is not enough, then what's the point of pet owners donating their dogs when they pass, Rupert's Fund? I totally support Rupert's Fund and research, but when comments like this are made on a public forum ESPECIALLY from people that are leading the efforts to help and speak out about this condition it can be harmful. Just from me reading this thread and other threads, I get the idea that the breed can't be saved and so I hesitate to want to help with something that seems pointless. I KNOW this is not how researchers and others feel, but when that crosses my mind, then I can see why it would for breeders also.
If CM can not be accepted, then basically then why are breeders even following SM protocols? Then this comment,
Quote:
Originally Posted by sins![](https://www.cavaliertalk.com/forums/images/buttons/viewpost.gif)
I feel sorry for the truly health focused breeder caught in the middle of this mess.
On one hand they're being branded as zealots and mavericks for trying to do the right thing and told that they're destroying the breed.Then on the other hand they're told that their efforts to reduce the incidence of SM isn't good enough,even though they breed A to A and have had tangible improvements in their stock.They donate lost puppies to FTR,they take the remains of their much loved dog for post mortem and it's just not good enough???
No wonder breeders are walking away in despair.
Looking at things quite dispassionately the statement I have highlighted in red is the truth.
Their efforts are not good enough to outweigh the relentless production of puppies from non-scanned underage cavalier parents."
Their efforts which have been improving SHOULD be focused on and not the negative because it makes me think why help when there is a negative attitude.
If CM can not be accepted, then basically then why are breeders even following SM protocols? Then this comment,
- 7th July 2011, 09:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sins
![](https://www.cavaliertalk.com/forums/images/buttons/viewpost.gif)
I feel sorry for the truly health focused breeder caught in the middle of this mess.
On one hand they're being branded as zealots and mavericks for trying to do the right thing and told that they're destroying the breed.Then on the other hand they're told that their efforts to reduce the incidence of SM isn't good enough,even though they breed A to A and have had tangible improvements in their stock.They donate lost puppies to FTR,they take the remains of their much loved dog for post mortem and it's just not good enough???
No wonder breeders are walking away in despair.
Their efforts are not good enough to outweigh the relentless production of puppies from non-scanned underage cavalier parents."
Their efforts which have been improving SHOULD be focused on and not the negative because it makes me think why help when there is a negative attitude.